<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Dear friends<br>
let me inform you about the following preprint on Astro-PH, <br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.2121">http://arxiv.org/abs/1002.2121</a><br>
<br>
regarding:<br>
<br>
<h1 class="title">the importance of background subtraction in the
analysis of coronal loops observed with TRACE</h1>
<br>
by Sergio Terzo and Fabio Reale, accepted for publication on A&A<br>
<br>
Abstract<br>
In the framework of TRACE coronal observations, we compare the analysis
and
diagnostics of a loop after subtracting the background with two
different and
independent methods. The dataset includes sequences of images in the
171 A, 195
A filter bands of TRACE. One background subtraction method consists in
taking
as background values those obtained from interpolation between
concentric
strips around the analyzed loop. The other method is a pixel-to-pixel
subtraction of the final image when the loop had completely faded out,
already
used by Reale & Ciaravella 2006. We compare the emission
distributions along
the loop obtained with the two methods and find that they are
considerably
different. We find differences as well in the related derive filter
ratio and
temperature profiles. In particular, the pixel-to-pixel subtraction
leads to
coherent diagnostics of a cooling loop. With the other subtraction the
diagnostics are much less clear. The background subtraction is a
delicate issue
in the analysis of a loop. The pixel-to-pixel subtraction appears to be
more
reliable, but its application is not always possible. Subtraction from
interpolation between surrounding regions can produce higher systematic
errors,
because of intersecting structures and of the large amount of
subtracted
emission in TRACE observations.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>