[Loops] EIS AR Loops - Tripathi et al, 2009, ApJ

[H.E.Mason at damtp.cam.ac.uk]

Agreed Fabio,

my sentiments exactly, and we definitely endorse higher spatial
resolution observations across a broad temperature range.

Best wishes,
helen

On Jan 6 2009, reale at astropa.unipa.it wrote:

>I agree with Leon, but I also think that the paper only certifies that the
>loops look fuzzier in hotter lines. There may be no real contradiction
>with Leon's perspective. Of course, we all sustain Leon's new imager.
>Ciao
>Fabio
>
>> Helen et al.,
>>
>> I can't let this go uncommented. Even though this paper was
>> accepted (I know, I was the editor) I disagree with the conclusion
>> that hot loops are fuzzier. Yes, that's what you see, but it is
>> also explainable if the hot parts of the AR have many fine threads
>> (unresolved at present resolution) with a large filling factor.
>> That as the conclusion Joan and I came to from analyzing 284A
>> data.
>>
>> Anyway, this won't be settled until we fly an imager with higher
>> resolution. We're proposing one this year and I'm hoping we get
>> the chance to clear this up, finally.
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Leon
>> _______________________________________________
>> Loops mailing list
>> Loops at solar.physics.montana.edu
>> https://mithra.physics.montana.edu/mailman/listinfo/loops
>>
>
>
>