[Loops] EIS AR Loops - Tripathi et al, 2009, ApJ

[Jean-François Hochedez]

Dear all,

I'd like the loop community to know that I still strive to embark a high
resolution hot channel as part of the EUI instrument of Solar Orbiter. This
is not easy as our overall mass budget has been reduced from 21kg to ~18kg.
Yet, there are still a couple of tracks that allow holding on. The active
support of some of you will play a role, and a presentation at the third
S.O. workshop in Sorrento next May could be one element among other useful
actions.

Best wishes,

Jean-François


Jean-Francois Hochedez
j-f.hochedez at sidc.be 
Royal Observatory of Belgium
Solar Physics Department
Circular Avenue, 3. B1180 Brussels Belgium
http://homepage.oma.be/hochedez/


-----Original Message-----
From: loops-bounces at mithra.physics.montana.edu
[mailto:loops-bounces at mithra.physics.montana.edu] On Behalf Of
H.E.Mason at damtp.cam.ac.uk
Sent: mercredi 7 janvier 2009 10:28
To: reale at astropa.unipa.it
Cc: A mailing list for scientists involved in the observation and modeling
ofsolar loop structures; loops at mithra.physics.montana.edu
Subject: Re: [Loops] EIS AR Loops - Tripathi et al, 2009, ApJ

Agreed Fabio,

my sentiments exactly, and we definitely endorse higher spatial
resolution observations across a broad temperature range.

Best wishes,
helen

On Jan 6 2009, reale at astropa.unipa.it wrote:

>I agree with Leon, but I also think that the paper only certifies that the
>loops look fuzzier in hotter lines. There may be no real contradiction
>with Leon's perspective. Of course, we all sustain Leon's new imager.
>Ciao
>Fabio
>
>> Helen et al.,
>>
>> I can't let this go uncommented. Even though this paper was
>> accepted (I know, I was the editor) I disagree with the conclusion
>> that hot loops are fuzzier. Yes, that's what you see, but it is
>> also explainable if the hot parts of the AR have many fine threads
>> (unresolved at present resolution) with a large filling factor.
>> That as the conclusion Joan and I came to from analyzing 284A
>> data.
>>
>> Anyway, this won't be settled until we fly an imager with higher
>> resolution. We're proposing one this year and I'm hoping we get
>> the chance to clear this up, finally.
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Leon
>> _______________________________________________
>> Loops mailing list
>> Loops at solar.physics.montana.edu
>> https://mithra.physics.montana.edu/mailman/listinfo/loops
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Loops mailing list
Loops at solar.physics.montana.edu
https://mithra.physics.montana.edu/mailman/listinfo/loops


__________ NOD32 3745 (20090107) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com