[Loops] EIS AR Loops - Tripathi et al, 2009, ApJ

[reale at astropa.unipa.it]

I agree with Leon, but I also think that the paper only certifies that the
loops look fuzzier in hotter lines. There may be no real contradiction
with Leon's perspective. Of course, we all sustain Leon's new imager.
Ciao
Fabio

> Helen et al.,
>
> I can't let this go uncommented. Even though this paper was
> accepted (I know, I was the editor) I disagree with the conclusion
> that hot loops are fuzzier. Yes, that's what you see, but it is
> also explainable if the hot parts of the AR have many fine threads
> (unresolved at present resolution) with a large filling factor.
> That as the conclusion Joan and I came to from analyzing 284A
> data.
>
> Anyway, this won't be settled until we fly an imager with higher
> resolution. We're proposing one this year and I'm hoping we get
> the chance to clear this up, finally.
> Cheers,
>
> Leon
> _______________________________________________
> Loops mailing list
> Loops at solar.physics.montana.edu
> https://mithra.physics.montana.edu/mailman/listinfo/loops
>